Landlord Notices must be Specific

Dispute between Landlord and Tenant

Where there is a landlord-tenant dispute in which the landlord served a notice on the Tenant alleging objectionable conduct then the landlord must be specific about the complaint they allege. The failure to provide particulars can make the notice defective, particularly in relation to an N5 notice.

With an N5, the key issue is whether the landlord’s notice provides the tenant adequate information about the alleged misconduct to permit the them to know what was complained about and how to to take corrective action, when possible. In Ball v. Metro Capital Property, 2002 CanLII 45504 (ON Div. Ct.), The Divisional Court concluded that a vague notice is ineffective where it fails to identify the alleged incidents with enough clarity, including matters such as:

the dates of the incidents that occurred;
the times they allegedly occurred, where relevant;
the nature of the conduct complained of; and
enough factual detail to allow the tenant to understand and answer the case.

On an N5 form there is only room to make the simplest of allegations, so additional space may be required. For a landlord the notice should not be void for vagueness. The underlying principle is procedural fairness: a tenant cannot meaningfully dispute or cure conduct that has only been described in vague or general terms. In practice, that means a notice based on alleged misconduct should not simply recite statutory language or broad accusations; it must connect the alleged breach to concrete facts. Both landlords and tenants need to be aware of this rule.

For a Landlord Invictus Legal LLP believes that you should engage a paralegal when drafting all your notices. Don't repeat what you learn at Facebook University.

Precision is Essential

The description of the wrongdoing matters. It must be accurate and help the Tenant correct their alleged wrongdoing. An N5 notice must set out the alleged wrongdoing with enough detail that the tenant can understand the case to meet and, if the notice is a first notice, correct it. In Ontario, a vague or cursory N5 can be deemed defective if it does not identify the incident(s), dates, times, locations, and nature of the alleged behavior with reasonable particularity. An N5 is used for allegations such as:

interference with reasonable enjoyment, e.g. music late at night, smells
damage to the rental unit or residential complex,
overcrowding.

For many conditions the Tenant has time to correct the problem, or not repeat it (in the example of playing loud music at night.

Because the notice can support an eviction application, it must do more than recite statutory language, it must contain the facts the landlord wishes to rely on. A notice is usually stronger if it includes:

date(s) and approximate time(s) of the incident;
specific conduct alleged;
where it occurred;
who was involved, if known;
what impact it had on others or the property;
any prior warnings or related incidents.

By contrast, a notice is vulnerable if it is vague, for example saying only:

“disturbing other tenants,”
“causing damage,” or
“creating noise and nuisance,”

without tying those claims to concrete facts, dates and times.

While this article discusses the N5 notice this also applies to other notices:

N1 / N4 / N9 the rent amount owed, arrears period, termination date, and payment details must be stated accurately and clearly
N6: the alleged illegal act, e.g. misrepresentation of income in subsidized housing, or permitting certain activities
N7: serious impairment of safety.
N8: persistent late payment of rent.
N12: landlord’s own use, purchaser’s own use, or family member’s use.
N13, the type of renovation that is planned.